builderall

Change in Sexuality Noted in England in Country-Wide Study
Debra Baty

This truth in Proverbs is important enough that Solomon repeats the exact verbiage in chapter 14 & 16. Clearly, this is a truth worth driving home… there are countless ways men, women and young people make foolish and destructive decisions based upon what seems right in the moment.
 

This faulty thinking can be traced all the way back to Adam and Eve’s original disobedience to God in the Garden of Eden. Even there, before sin saturated nearly every aspect of humanity, a decision was made. A decision based not on what God clearly stated, but on what “seemed right” regardless of what God said.
 

Naturally, the world doesn’t care about God’s laws. Many don’t even believe in the reality of a personal God who created all things, let alone a God who gave His life to redeem hopelessly fallen humanity. The real issue isn’t the perspective of the unchurched and non-believers. Rather, the far greater concern is so many are living according to “a way that seems right” to them, even as professed Christ-followers.
 

The examples are endless, but certainly compromise made in the inordinate pursuit of: pleasure, comfort, money, careers, retirement planning, following feelings, personal happiness, sex, and identity are a few of the many ways we set ourselves on a path leading toward death because we reject God’s way for what feels right to us.
 

As our understanding of and value for God’s laws diminish, we functionally consider ourselves to be more enlightened and “nicer” than God. So we make compromises for ourselves and others that often seem small at the time, frequently giving way to cumulative or major sudden life-choices that are a total departure from God’s intention and outside of His protective boundaries.
 

When this happens, we engage in the same distorted thinking and reasoning as Eve. We observe the “fruit” before us (whatever that might be). Satan, the world, and our own flesh reason that “it” seems good (Genesis 3:6) and we depart the narrow path of life for the wide path of destruction and death. Sadly, in our deluded condition we often influence others to join us on this path that promises wisdom, fun, and freedom, but actually leads to bondage.
 

Setting aside the many areas we as purported Christ-followers and regular church-attendeee ignore the lordship of Christ in our lives and abandon The Narrow Way, this particular blog post is addressing one primary area: cohabitation.
 

In 2019 Pew Research reported that 58% of white evangelicals approved of cohabitation if the couple intended to get married.
 

According an article at www.probe.org/cohabitation “Cohabitation, as a lifestyle, is on the rise. Consider the significant growth in cohabitation rates in the last few decades. In 1960 and 1970, about a half million were living together. But by 1980 that number was 1.5 million. By 1990 the number was nearly three million. And by 2000 the number was almost five million.

Researchers estimate that today as many as 50% of Americans cohabit at one time or another prior to marriage. The stereotype of two young, childless people living together is not completely accurate; currently, some 40% of cohabiting relationships involve children.”
 

I have a friend who regularly attends church, participates in Bible-studies, and highly values connecting with other Christians for support and mutual encouragement. She gave her all to an abusive first marriage, doing everything she knew to walk out her commitment and vows. When she discovered that her husband was committing adultery repeatedly she separated from him for a significant amount of time. With his apparent repentance and commitment to work on their marriage, supported by positive actions on his part over time, she returned home in hopes of participating in the much needed growth and development of a far better marriage.
 

Unfortunately, he did not have the same level of commitment, and as bad as the first 10 years of their marriage was, the years that followed were far worse, including more adultery. Eventually, she left the marriage and divorced her husband. She was devastated, to say the least, and needed time and counseling.
 

Eventually, without any intention of pursuing a relationship she became friends with a Christian guy, which led to a romantic connection. This brought about a dilemma. My friend had been so emotionally and mentally abused and violated, she was totally afraid of the prospect of ever marrying again. She also didn’t want to put her kids or herself through another failed marriage. She and her boyfriend wound up crossing sexual boundary lines. After that behavior continued for months, it didn’t seem like a big deal for him to move in, with the idea that it wouldn’t be long before they would “tie the knot”.
 

It’s been 4 or 5 years. They attend church together and seemingly have a life and family together, but with no actual commitment. Her boyfriend wants to get married, but there are still so many areas of unprocessed pain and fear it’s just been easier for my friend to stay where she’s at – living a life of cohabitation, disconnecting from God and her own conscience in this area and ignoring the impact her behavior is having on her now adult children, who are great young men and women, but care nothing for Christianity. Her witness for Christ and her inner peace have been compromised.
 

In most cases though, cohabitation isn’t about unresolved or avoided trauma from a previous marriage. It’s simply convenient; a way to save money, a way to “test drive” the guy or girl before saying “I do”. But this is a complete disregard for the institution of covenant marriage originated by God.
 

At www.crosswalk.com an article entitled, “Cohabitation and divorce - - is there a correlation?” stated the following: A 2010 "meta-analysis" looked at 26 peer-reviewed, published studies that followed various couples over time. This analysis found that marrieds who had cohabiting pasts were more likely to face divorce, and that "noncohabitors seem to have more confidence in the future of their relationship, and have less accepting attitudes toward divorce.
 

Hebrews 13:4 is frank and clear, “Marriage is to be held in honor among all, and the marriage bed is to be undefiled; for fornicators [those who have sex before marriage] and adulterers [those who have sex with someone other than their spouse after marriage] God will judge.”
 

A few years ago a friend confided in me that he was completely baffled by his 12-step program leader. He had been part of a popular Christian recovery program in a local church for more than a year, working out his own substance abuse issues. He had recently learned that his leader was living with his girlfriend, but according to the leader they weren’t having sex.
 

While it is possible (though highly unlikely) they were not having sex, is that all that matters in whether or not couples are cohabitating? Aside from the fact that sexual sin is far more likely when we are living and sleeping under the same roof, how does this impact those who look to us as a shepherd or mentor? Either this will generate mistrust (as it should), undermine the leader’s character, or it may embolden others to live out the same practice, usually without any effective boundaries to guard against sexual sin.
 

1 Thessalonians 5:21-22 says “But examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good; abstain from every appearance of evil”. Avoiding or delaying marriage and cohabitating instead may seem like wisdom, but it’s definitely not godly wisdom.
 

Staying on the narrow path with God and trusting His many commands to avoid sexual immorality are both good and for our flourishing, leads toward fulfillment, joy, and life. Let’s choose life, rather than momentary pleasure accompanied by severe long-term consequences.

BACK TO THE NARROW WAY
A number of times in R4R, we’ve covered the findings of Dr. Lisa Diamond, a researcher at the Univ. of Utah.  She has reviewed longitudinal studies (covering 10 years or more) of tens of thousands of individuals regarding their sexuality, finding exclusive attractions to the same sex to be rare.  These findings are consistent with a survey taken in England as well. 
 
Rev. D. Paul Sullins, PhD, presented on the Third British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles on Oct. 15, 2022.[1]  Dr. Sullins is the Research Professor of Sociology at the Catholic University of America and Senior Research Associate of the Ruth Institute.  His work was previously highlighted in R4R last Oct.[2]

This presentation was based on a paper he was preparing with Steph James,[3] which, as of the date of this writing, has not yet been published.  He began with this question and answer:
Why study representative population study data?

A nationally representative sample is a country’s testimony to itself. 

Large scale population studies are often commissioned to show population’s needs to those that govern it, but today the government, representatives and scholars show little interest to know or acknowledge the actual experience of persons in the population.

…Careful, detailed examination of the actual reported sexual experience of persons in the population can present empirical truths that witness to the identity of human embodiment in ways that are hard to deny.

 
•       It can expose the falsehoods put forth by anyone who would deny these truths in the interest of imposing a top-down ideological agenda on human sexual behavior.
 
•       And to those whose lives do not conform to that agenda, it can comfort them with the knowledge that they are not alone.
 
As we’ve often noted in R4R, studies covering larger numbers of people carry more weight than smaller sample sizes.  These smaller samples are frequently hidden by the report of percentages rather than actual numbers in the abstracts and conclusions of reports.
 
The Study

Here is how this study was conducted:
 
From September 2010 to August 2012, Natsal-3 interviewed 15,162 household residents aged 16-74 in England, Scotland, and Wales, selected using a stratified multi-stage cluster sampling frame that was probabilistically representative of the British population.  The contact response rate was 57.7%.
 
…During the interview, male (female) participants were shown three cards related to the dimensions of sexual orientation, with options associated with random letters of the alphabet, and asked to tell which letter best represented them to the interviewer who entered the letter into a computer.
 
•       One card, labeled “Sexual identity,” asked “Which of the options on this card best describes how you think of yourself.?”  The response options, conforming to the guidelines of the Office of National Statistics (13), were “Heterosexual / Straight; Gay / Lesbian; Bisexual; Other.”
 
•       Earlier in the interview, participants were presented a card that read, “I have felt sexually attracted. . . (1) Only to females (males), never to males (females) (2) More often to females (males), and at least once to a male (female) (3) About equally often to females (males) and to males (females) (4) More often to males (females), and at least once to a female (male) (5) Only to males (females), never to females (males) (6) I have never felt sexually attracted to anyone at all.”  
 
Another card presented six similar response options for sexual experience, defined as any form of sexual contact. Respondents who did not indicate an absence of sexual experience (i.e., all responses except option 6) were then given a computer and asked to enter directly, without telling the interviewer, whether the sexual experience involved genital contact and about the number and sex of their sex partners in the past year, the past 5 years, and ever.[4
So, we see a large, random sample of a wide age range of people taken with some degree of privacy provided to those responding to surveyors' questions.  Questions were separated into recording attractions, behavior, and identity. 
 
The Findings

Dr. Sullins pointed out 85% of women and 79% of men who identified as lesbian/gay “had changed partnership type from before five years ago.”  About two-thirds of these (67% women and 62% men) “changed to opposite-sex partners only.  17%-18% changed to same-sex partners only.  No one changed from opposite-sex only to same-sex only.”
 
This reveals a significant trajectory towards opposite-sex partnerships among those who identify as lesbian or gay.  In addition, 97% those who identify as heterosexual reported opposite sex partners, while only 41% of those who identified as gay/lesbian reported same sex partners.  And 93% of those who identified as heterosexual reported attractions to the opposite sex, while only 43% of those who identified as gay/lesbian reported attractions to the same sex. 
 
Other Studies
 
Dr. Sullins also passed along this helpful summary of findings in other major longitudinal studies, as reviewed by Dr. Lisa Diamond:
Here we see four studies in the left column (Add Health, GUTS, MSMD, & DMHD) representing 32,000 people. All note changes in attractions, the majority from attractions for the same sex to those for the opposite sex. Fluidity in the opposite direction was relatively small in comparison.
 
All of this information reveals that experiencing attractions to the same sex at one point in your life does not guarantee these will be the only attractions you’ll experience later on.  There is solid evidence that fluidity of attractions exists, and it flows mostly toward attractions for the opposite sex.  Another way of thinking about this is that we have been created with a heterosexual reproductive system, and most people will end up with desires in harmony with this design.  It is OK to pursue support and encouragement to explore attractions to the opposite sex.
 
[1] “Most same-sex oriented people eventually change: one or more dimensions of sexuality.”
 
[2] “SOCE Helpful, Not Harmful – Part I, Reduction in Suicidal Ideation Found,” “SOCE Helpful, Not Harmful – Part II, Psychological and Social Harms Reduced,” “SOCE Helpful, Not Harmful – Part III, Intentional Bias”
 
[3] “The association of partner type instability with sexual orientation incongruity among sexual minorities in Britain: findings from the National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles 2012-2012”
 
[4] “Most same-sex oriented people eventually change: one or more dimensions of sexuality.”

Confidential phone call or online meeting

We are here to help you. You can send us a general message on the contact form to the right, or if you would like to schedule a free, private and confidential phone call or online meeting with Garry Ingraham, please click here